Review



roc analysis tool  (OriginLab corp)


Bioz Manufacturer Symbol OriginLab corp manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    OriginLab corp roc analysis tool
    <t>ROC</t> curves for the QA tool comparison. The investigated plan acceptance criteria include γ 2%/2 mm , γ 2%/1 mm , and γ 1%/1 mm for PD and γ 3%/3 mm , γ 3%/2 mm , and γ 2%/2 mm for ArcCHECK gamma analysis. (a) <t>ROC</t> <t>analysis</t> per treatment plan. While ArcCHECK measurements were evaluated for the entire plan, for PD the worst arc's gamma passing rate was assigned to each plan. (b) ROC analysis for PD measurements analyzed per treatment field. Higher diagnostic performance is indicated by curves with larger area under the ROC curve.
    Roc Analysis Tool, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/roc analysis tool/product/OriginLab corp
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    roc analysis tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Sensitivity and specificity of Varian Halcyon's portal dosimetry for plan‐specific pre‐treatment QA"

    Article Title: Sensitivity and specificity of Varian Halcyon's portal dosimetry for plan‐specific pre‐treatment QA

    Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

    doi: 10.1002/acm2.14001

    ROC curves for the QA tool comparison. The investigated plan acceptance criteria include γ 2%/2 mm , γ 2%/1 mm , and γ 1%/1 mm for PD and γ 3%/3 mm , γ 3%/2 mm , and γ 2%/2 mm for ArcCHECK gamma analysis. (a) ROC analysis per treatment plan. While ArcCHECK measurements were evaluated for the entire plan, for PD the worst arc's gamma passing rate was assigned to each plan. (b) ROC analysis for PD measurements analyzed per treatment field. Higher diagnostic performance is indicated by curves with larger area under the ROC curve.
    Figure Legend Snippet: ROC curves for the QA tool comparison. The investigated plan acceptance criteria include γ 2%/2 mm , γ 2%/1 mm , and γ 1%/1 mm for PD and γ 3%/3 mm , γ 3%/2 mm , and γ 2%/2 mm for ArcCHECK gamma analysis. (a) ROC analysis per treatment plan. While ArcCHECK measurements were evaluated for the entire plan, for PD the worst arc's gamma passing rate was assigned to each plan. (b) ROC analysis for PD measurements analyzed per treatment field. Higher diagnostic performance is indicated by curves with larger area under the ROC curve.

    Techniques Used: Comparison, Diagnostic Assay



    Similar Products

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc roc analysis tools graphpad prism 9.0
    Roc Analysis Tools Graphpad Prism 9.0, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/roc analysis tools graphpad prism 9.0/product/GraphPad Software Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    roc analysis tools graphpad prism 9.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    SPSS Inc roc analysis tool
    Roc Analysis Tool, supplied by SPSS Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/roc analysis tool/product/SPSS Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    roc analysis tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MedCalc Software Ltd roc curve analysis tool
    Roc Curve Analysis Tool, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/roc curve analysis tool/product/MedCalc Software Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    roc curve analysis tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    OriginLab corp roc analysis tool
    <t>ROC</t> curves for the QA tool comparison. The investigated plan acceptance criteria include γ 2%/2 mm , γ 2%/1 mm , and γ 1%/1 mm for PD and γ 3%/3 mm , γ 3%/2 mm , and γ 2%/2 mm for ArcCHECK gamma analysis. (a) <t>ROC</t> <t>analysis</t> per treatment plan. While ArcCHECK measurements were evaluated for the entire plan, for PD the worst arc's gamma passing rate was assigned to each plan. (b) ROC analysis for PD measurements analyzed per treatment field. Higher diagnostic performance is indicated by curves with larger area under the ROC curve.
    Roc Analysis Tool, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/roc analysis tool/product/OriginLab corp
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    roc analysis tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Johns Hopkins HealthCare roc curve analysis tool
    Entire sample <t>ROC</t> analysis of ICP and B4C P2/P1 ratios for an ICP value cut-off >20 mmHg ( up ). The power of predicting intracranial hypertension was reduced because of sample heterogeneity. The B4C P2/P1 ratio cut-off 1 ( down ) was equivalent to ICP P2/P1 ratio cut-off 1 (AUC 0.9).
    Roc Curve Analysis Tool, supplied by Johns Hopkins HealthCare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/roc curve analysis tool/product/Johns Hopkins HealthCare
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    roc curve analysis tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    OriginLab corp roc curve analysis tool originpro v.9.0
    Entire sample <t>ROC</t> analysis of ICP and B4C P2/P1 ratios for an ICP value cut-off >20 mmHg ( up ). The power of predicting intracranial hypertension was reduced because of sample heterogeneity. The B4C P2/P1 ratio cut-off 1 ( down ) was equivalent to ICP P2/P1 ratio cut-off 1 (AUC 0.9).
    Roc Curve Analysis Tool Originpro V.9.0, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/roc curve analysis tool originpro v.9.0/product/OriginLab corp
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    roc curve analysis tool originpro v.9.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MedCalc Software Ltd roc analysis tool
    Receiver Operating Characteristics <t>(ROC)</t> analysis: Dichotomized values for the visual readouts from 96 well plates of the TCID 50 assays were compared with the OD values obtained from <t>the</t> <t>MTT</t> assay using ROC analysis tool in the MedCalc Inc. software, to obtain a cut-off value to distinguish between positive and negative wells. The true positive rate (sensitivity) and the false positive rate (100-specificity) were plotted at the Y and X axis respectively at different cutoff points for the OD values. The curve obtained is indicative of the sensitivity and specificity of the assay at a given cutoff point. The top left corner, representing the area under the curve (AUC) or accuracy of the test, was 0.931. At the selected cutoff of ≥ 0.53 the specificity was 95%, while the sensitivity was 81% with a p value of <0.0001.
    Roc Analysis Tool, supplied by MedCalc Software Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/roc analysis tool/product/MedCalc Software Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    roc analysis tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Johns Hopkins HealthCare web-based roc analysis tool
    Receiver Operating Characteristics <t>(ROC)</t> analysis: Dichotomized values for the visual readouts from 96 well plates of the TCID 50 assays were compared with the OD values obtained from <t>the</t> <t>MTT</t> assay using ROC analysis tool in the MedCalc Inc. software, to obtain a cut-off value to distinguish between positive and negative wells. The true positive rate (sensitivity) and the false positive rate (100-specificity) were plotted at the Y and X axis respectively at different cutoff points for the OD values. The curve obtained is indicative of the sensitivity and specificity of the assay at a given cutoff point. The top left corner, representing the area under the curve (AUC) or accuracy of the test, was 0.931. At the selected cutoff of ≥ 0.53 the specificity was 95%, while the sensitivity was 81% with a p value of <0.0001.
    Web Based Roc Analysis Tool, supplied by Johns Hopkins HealthCare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/web-based roc analysis tool/product/Johns Hopkins HealthCare
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    web-based roc analysis tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ROC curves for the QA tool comparison. The investigated plan acceptance criteria include γ 2%/2 mm , γ 2%/1 mm , and γ 1%/1 mm for PD and γ 3%/3 mm , γ 3%/2 mm , and γ 2%/2 mm for ArcCHECK gamma analysis. (a) ROC analysis per treatment plan. While ArcCHECK measurements were evaluated for the entire plan, for PD the worst arc's gamma passing rate was assigned to each plan. (b) ROC analysis for PD measurements analyzed per treatment field. Higher diagnostic performance is indicated by curves with larger area under the ROC curve.

    Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

    Article Title: Sensitivity and specificity of Varian Halcyon's portal dosimetry for plan‐specific pre‐treatment QA

    doi: 10.1002/acm2.14001

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ROC curves for the QA tool comparison. The investigated plan acceptance criteria include γ 2%/2 mm , γ 2%/1 mm , and γ 1%/1 mm for PD and γ 3%/3 mm , γ 3%/2 mm , and γ 2%/2 mm for ArcCHECK gamma analysis. (a) ROC analysis per treatment plan. While ArcCHECK measurements were evaluated for the entire plan, for PD the worst arc's gamma passing rate was assigned to each plan. (b) ROC analysis for PD measurements analyzed per treatment field. Higher diagnostic performance is indicated by curves with larger area under the ROC curve.

    Article Snippet: Based on the dedicated ROC analysis tool, as provided by OriginPro v.9.0 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA), sensitivity and specificity for both PD and ArcCHECK QA using the aforementioned assessment at varying decision thresholds were evaluated.

    Techniques: Comparison, Diagnostic Assay

    Entire sample ROC analysis of ICP and B4C P2/P1 ratios for an ICP value cut-off >20 mmHg ( up ). The power of predicting intracranial hypertension was reduced because of sample heterogeneity. The B4C P2/P1 ratio cut-off 1 ( down ) was equivalent to ICP P2/P1 ratio cut-off 1 (AUC 0.9).

    Journal: Journal of Personalized Medicine

    Article Title: A Novel Noninvasive Technique for Intracranial Pressure Waveform Monitoring in Critical Care

    doi: 10.3390/jpm11121302

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Entire sample ROC analysis of ICP and B4C P2/P1 ratios for an ICP value cut-off >20 mmHg ( up ). The power of predicting intracranial hypertension was reduced because of sample heterogeneity. The B4C P2/P1 ratio cut-off 1 ( down ) was equivalent to ICP P2/P1 ratio cut-off 1 (AUC 0.9).

    Article Snippet: Additionally, a linear correlation was presented using R. The ROC curve analysis was performed using the Johns Hopkins University tool (available at www.jrocfit.org ).

    Techniques:

    Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis: Dichotomized values for the visual readouts from 96 well plates of the TCID 50 assays were compared with the OD values obtained from the MTT assay using ROC analysis tool in the MedCalc Inc. software, to obtain a cut-off value to distinguish between positive and negative wells. The true positive rate (sensitivity) and the false positive rate (100-specificity) were plotted at the Y and X axis respectively at different cutoff points for the OD values. The curve obtained is indicative of the sensitivity and specificity of the assay at a given cutoff point. The top left corner, representing the area under the curve (AUC) or accuracy of the test, was 0.931. At the selected cutoff of ≥ 0.53 the specificity was 95%, while the sensitivity was 81% with a p value of <0.0001.

    Journal: Journal of Virological Methods

    Article Title: A convenient colorimetric assay for the quantification of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus and neutralizing antibodies

    doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.09.003

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis: Dichotomized values for the visual readouts from 96 well plates of the TCID 50 assays were compared with the OD values obtained from the MTT assay using ROC analysis tool in the MedCalc Inc. software, to obtain a cut-off value to distinguish between positive and negative wells. The true positive rate (sensitivity) and the false positive rate (100-specificity) were plotted at the Y and X axis respectively at different cutoff points for the OD values. The curve obtained is indicative of the sensitivity and specificity of the assay at a given cutoff point. The top left corner, representing the area under the curve (AUC) or accuracy of the test, was 0.931. At the selected cutoff of ≥ 0.53 the specificity was 95%, while the sensitivity was 81% with a p value of <0.0001.

    Article Snippet: Fig. 3 Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis: Dichotomized values for the visual readouts from 96 well plates of the TCID 50 assays were compared with the OD values obtained from the MTT assay using ROC analysis tool in the MedCalc Inc. software, to obtain a cut-off value to distinguish between positive and negative wells.

    Techniques: MTT Assay, Software